With the confetti settled on the NBA Finals, the league`s gaze swiftly pivots to the future: the 2025 NBA Draft. This annual infusion of young talent isn`t just a selection process; it`s a strategic chessboard where teams jockey for position, assess potential, and sometimes, make bold, unexpected moves that reshape trajectories for years to come. This year`s draft is proving to be no exception, offering a mix of clear-cut top prospects and a deep pool of intriguing talent, all against a backdrop of significant trade activity.
While the top two picks seem all but sealed, a fascinating ripple effect is playing out across the lottery and into the mid-first round. New intelligence and, crucially, recent trades have painted a dynamic picture, creating both opportunities and dilemmas for franchises positioning themselves for success. Let`s dissect the current landscape, analyzing the projected picks based on the latest intel and the strategic underpinnings driving team decisions.
The Anticipated Top Two: Certainty Amidst Chaos
Barring unforeseen last-minute seismic shifts, the consensus holds firm at the very top. The Dallas Mavericks, having secured the coveted first overall pick, are widely expected to select forward Cooper Flagg from Duke. Flagg, a versatile two-way player, recently visited Dallas, reportedly leaving a strong impression on the organization. His blend of skill, athleticism, and defensive acumen positions him as an immediate impact player for a Mavericks team aiming to remain competitive.
Immediately following, the San Antonio Spurs hold the second pick and appear equally locked onto Rutgers` guard Dylan Harper. The Spurs, focused on patiently building around their foundational star, view Harper as a potential cornerstone. His combination of size for a guard, shot-creating ability, passing vision, and physical toughness make him an ideal offensive engine for the modern NBA, and San Antonio seems unwilling to entertain trade offers for this pick.
Height (no shoes): 6-7¾ | Weight: 221 | Wingspan: 7-0 | Standing Reach: 8-10½
Height (no shoes): 6-4½ | Weight: 213 | Wingspan: 6-10½ | Standing Reach: 8-6
The Shifting Lottery: Player Preference and Team Dilemmas
The real intrigue begins at pick number three, held by the Philadelphia 76ers. While Baylor`s guard VJ Edgecombe appears to be the likely choice, the situation is complicated by forward Ace Bailey`s apparent reluctance to work out for or be drafted by teams in the top five. This creates a peculiar dynamic, forcing teams like Philadelphia to potentially draft a player who seems to prefer landing elsewhere – a strategic risk, to say the least. Edgecombe, despite reportedly showing some nerves in workouts, impressed the 76ers with his interviews, and his explosive athleticism and flashes of passing and defensive potential offer significant upside.
This potential slide by Bailey significantly impacts the teams immediately following: Charlotte (at #4), Utah (at #5), Washington (at #6), New Orleans (at #7), and Brooklyn (at #8). The Charlotte Hornets, needing perimeter shooting and playmaking, might pivot towards Duke`s Kon Knueppel if Edgecombe is gone, prioritizing his analytics-friendly profile and floor-spacing ability, even if it means potentially bypassing higher-ceiling options like Bailey or guard Jeremiah Fears, neither of whom reportedly worked out for the Hornets. There`s even talk Charlotte might trade down.
The Utah Jazz, under new leadership and in need of star power, could take a swing on Fears, an Oklahoma guard praised for his speed, pace, and shot creation, despite being one of the younger players in the class. His potential is undeniable, making him an attractive option for teams looking for a long-term offensive engine.
The Washington Wizards at six are among the teams reportedly preferred by Ace Bailey. If he falls here due to his strategic workout decisions, the Wizards could land a player ranked significantly higher on most talent boards. Bailey`s high ceiling as an All-Star-caliber wing with elite shotmaking potential makes this a calculated gamble that could pay massive dividends, potentially recouping any lost rookie contract money with a lucrative second deal – a fascinating play that rival agents are watching closely, perhaps with a wry smile.
Further down, New Orleans (at #7) and Brooklyn (at #8) are also linked to this fluid group. The Pelicans could target Duke center Khaman Maluach, a defensive anchor with impressive physical tools and off-court intangibles, filling a clear need for a true center. However, rumors persist about Maryland`s skilled big man Derik Queen also being in play for New Orleans, potentially due to long-standing connections within their front office. Brooklyn, holding multiple first-round picks after recent trades, is unlikely to trade out of the #8 spot, feeling confident they will land a targeted player like Texas guard Tre Johnson, a consensus talent in this range, offering much-needed scoring punch in a situation with ample playing time available.
Height (no shoes): 6-4 | Weight: 193 | Wingspan: 6-7½ | Standing Reach: 8-5½
Height (no shoes): 6-5 | Weight: 219 | Wingspan: 6-6¼ | Standing Reach: 8-5½
Height (no shoes): 6-2½ | Weight: 179 | Wingspan: 6-5¼ | Standing Reach: 8-2½
Height (no shoes): 6-7½ | Weight: 202 | Wingspan: 7-0½ | Standing Reach: 8-11
Height (no shoes): 7-0¾ | Weight: 252 | Wingspan: 7-6¾ | Standing Reach: 9-6
Height (no shoes): 6-4¾ | Weight: 190 | Wingspan: 6-10¼ | Standing Reach: 8-5
Mid-First Round Prospects and Trade Impacts
The draft board continues to churn in the middle of the first round, influenced by team needs and recent transactions. The Toronto Raptors (#9) could look overseas to Germany`s Noa Essengue, a raw but physically gifted forward whose length, mobility, and defensive potential align with their organizational philosophy, despite needing development in shooting.
The Phoenix Suns, newly acquiring the #10 pick via the trade sending Kevin Durant to Houston, are an intriguing wild card. With multiple high-usage scorers now on the roster, conventional wisdom suggests they`ll target a defense-minded frontcourt player. Arizona forward Carter Bryant fits this mold, offering shooting, passing value, and defensive versatility that could complement their star power.
Portland (#11) and Chicago (#12) follow, potentially considering players like Illinois guard Kasparas Jakucionis, known for his unselfish playmaking, or South Carolina forward/center Collin Murray-Boyles. Murray-Boyles, in particular, rates highly in analytics models due to his unique combination of passing, foul drawing, defensive activity, and youth, making him an appealing “high floor” option despite his size and lack of perimeter shooting being potential question marks. Chicago, needing frontcourt help, could see him as a fit.
Atlanta (#13), having just acquired Kristaps Porzingis and sending the #22 pick to Brooklyn, likely won`t prioritize a traditional big man here. They might take a swing on BYU guard/forward Egor Demin, a prospect with intriguing size for a perimeter playmaker whose development will hinge on his shooting progress.
San Antonio (#14) returns to the board and could double down on frontcourt depth by adding Slovenia`s Joan Beringer. His impressive measurements, particularly his wingspan and shot-blocking ability, draw comparisons to established NBA rim protectors, making him an attractive option to pair with Victor Wembanyama long-term.
Height (no shoes): 6-10 | Weight: 204 | Wingspan: 7-1 | Standing Reach: 9-2
Height (no shoes): 6-6½ | Weight: 214 | Wingspan: 6-11¾ | Standing Reach: 8-10
Height (no shoes): 6-4¾ | Weight: 205 | Wingspan: 6-7¾ | Standing Reach: 8-3½
Height (no shoes): 6-6½ | Weight: 239 | Wingspan: 7-0¾ | Standing Reach: 8-10
Height (no shoes): 6-9¼ | Weight: 199 | Wingspan: 6-10¼ | Standing Reach: 8-9½
Height (no shoes): 6-11 | Weight: 235 | Wingspan: 7-4½ | Standing Reach: 9-3
Rounding Out the First Round: Upside Swings and Depth Additions
As the first round progresses, teams look for specific needs, best available talent, or upside swings. The Oklahoma City Thunder (#15), fresh off a championship run, lack glaring needs but are often linked to big men. Despite concerns about conditioning, Maryland center Derik Queen`s offensive skill set makes him a potential “bet on talent” for a stable organization like OKC, which has defensive depth to mitigate his weaknesses.
The Memphis Grizzlies, acquiring the #16 pick, could tap into rising stock with Washington State`s Cedric Coward. His impressive physical tools, shooting, and defensive potential, particularly given his rapid ascent from Division III, make him an intriguing prospect for teams in this range.
Minnesota (#17), potentially open to trading the pick, or other frontcourt-needy teams could target Georgetown center Thomas Sorber. Despite a recent injury, his frame, wingspan, and rim protection ability are highly valued.
Washington (#18) or Brooklyn (#19) might look to Michigan forward Danny Wolf or Georgia forward/center Asa Newell respectively. Wolf offers a unique mix of size and playmaking that intrigues teams despite being polarizing. Newell has improved his stock by showcasing his physical tools and shooting potential, representing a developmental upside pick.
Miami (#20), notoriously tight-lipped about their draft plans, could target a versatile wing scorer like UConn`s Liam McNeeley or perhaps Florida guard Walter Clayton Jr., known for his dynamic shotmaking, who is also on the radar for multiple teams higher up.
Further international flavor could come from Real Madrid`s Hugo Gonzalez (#21, Utah), a defensive-minded wing who brings frenetic energy, or France`s Nolan Traore (#22, Brooklyn), a point guard with intriguing size and playmaking creativity who offers significant upside as a later pick.
Finally, New Orleans (#23), re-entering the first round via a recent trade, could add backcourt shooting with a player like Walter Clayton Jr. if he`s available, providing a potential plug-and-play bench scorer for a team that just reshuffled some veteran pieces.
Height (no shoes): 6-9¼ | Weight: 247 | Wingspan: 7-0½ | Standing Reach: 9-1½
Height (no shoes): 6-5¼ | Weight: 213 | Wingspan: 7-2¼ | Standing Reach: 8-10
Height (no shoes): 6-9¼ | Weight: 262 | Wingspan: 7-6 | Standing Reach: 9-1
Height (no shoes): 6-10½ | Weight: 251 | Wingspan: 7-2¼ | Standing Reach: 9-1
Height (no shoes): 6-9 | Weight: 224 | Wingspan: 6-11¼ | Standing Reach: 8-11½
Height (no shoes): 6-6¾ | Weight: 214 | Wingspan: 6-8½ | Standing Reach: 8-3½
Height (no shoes): 6-6¼ | Weight: 223 | Wingspan: 6-10¾ | Standing Reach: 8-5½
Height (no shoes): 6-3 | Weight: 175 | Wingspan: 6-8 | Standing Reach: 8-5½
Height (no shoes): 6-2 | Weight: 199 | Wingspan: 6-4 | Standing Reach: 8-1½
This mock draft provides a snapshot of the fluid situation just before draft night. Team strategies are evolving, player workouts and interviews are influencing decisions, and trades are altering the landscape. While the top may be predictable, the vast middle of the first round is ripe for surprises, calculated risks, and the selections that could very well define the next generation of NBA talent. The drama, as always, is in the details and the choices made when the clock starts ticking.