The BMF Belt Brouhaha: Holloway Casts Doubt on Topuria’s ‘Wasteful’ Championship Claim

MMA news

In the dynamic and often theatrical world of mixed martial arts, championship belts are the ultimate symbol of supremacy. Yet, not all belts carry the same weight, nor are they acquired through identical means. A curious dispute has emerged from the UFC featherweight division, casting a spotlight on the esoteric `BMF` (Baddest Motherf***er) title. The current, undisputed holder, Max “Blessed” Holloway, recently voiced his bewilderment over fellow fighter Ilia “El Matador” Topuria`s public displays and claims concerning the very belt Holloway rightfully earned and defended.

The Genesis of a Symbolic Title

The BMF belt was introduced as a unique, one-off championship. It wasn`t intended to represent a traditional divisional hierarchy, but rather to crown the fighter deemed the most audacious and entertaining in the octagon. Its inaugural bout featured Jorge Masvidal and Nate Diaz, a contest that captivated audiences with its sheer bravado and no-holds-barred ethos. Holloway later inherited this mantle, solidifying his claim with a masterful performance against Justin Gaethje, followed by a recent, dominant decision victory over Dustin Poirier at UFC 318, where he once again affirmed his status as the division`s toughest competitor.

Topuria`s Bold Assertion: A Belt Acquired Through… Commerce?

The core of the current controversy lies in Ilia Topuria`s actions post-UFC 308, where he defeated Holloway. While that bout was a significant featherweight clash, the BMF belt was not on the line. Topuria subsequently moved to the lightweight division, where he decisively knocked out Charles Oliveira to claim the undisputed 155-pound championship at UFC 317. Despite this monumental achievement, Topuria has continued to post images of himself with the BMF belt, even proclaiming it “still mine” after Holloway`s defense against Poirier. This public assertion has left many, including Holloway himself, scratching their heads.

Holloway`s Candid Rebuke: A Matter of Principle, and Finances

In the aftermath of his UFC 318 victory, Holloway addressed Topuria`s antics with characteristic directness. He questioned the logic behind Topuria`s claim, particularly given that the belt was not a contested prize in their previous encounter. Holloway drew a stark parallel to other champions, noting, “Did you see [Islam Makhachev] walking around with [another] champion’s belt after beating [Alexander Volkanovski] two times? You know what I mean? Like, the belt wasn’t on the line. Get over it, brother.”

The true irony, and perhaps the underlying source of Holloway`s mild disdain, appears to stem from the possibility that Topuria may have purchased a replica of the belt. “Why did you spend money on a damn f*cking belt?” Holloway quipped, adding later, “That’s just crazy to me. I know you’re rich and all, but that’s just a waste of money.” This sentiment, while delivered with a touch of Hawaiian laid-back charm, underscores a fundamental principle in combat sports: championship belts are earned through combat, not acquired through commercial transactions.

The Unwritten Rules of Championship Lineage

Holloway`s remarks highlight an unwritten code within the fight game. While promotional theatrics are par for the course, claiming a championship that was not formally contested or won, especially if acquired outside the octagon`s competitive framework, borders on the farcical. It`s a symbolic misstep that, for a fighter of Holloway`s caliber and integrity, appears to betray the very spirit of legitimate competition.

For Topuria, an undisputed lightweight champion with a burgeoning legacy, the continued attachment to an unearned BMF title seems peculiar. One might surmise it`s an attempt to further bolster his `bad boy` image or to simply needle Holloway. However, to the reigning BMF champion, it signifies a misunderstanding of the title`s unique lineage and, perhaps more pointedly, a curious allocation of resources.

What Lies Ahead: A Symbolic vs. Tangible Rivalry?

While an immediate rematch between Holloway and Topuria seems unlikely given their current trajectories—Holloway firmly entrenched in featherweight and Topuria reigning over lightweight—this verbal sparring adds another intriguing layer to their rivalry. It transforms a past fight into an ongoing narrative, a battle not just for physical dominance, but for symbolic ownership and perceived legitimacy. Whether this BMF belt brouhaha will ever culminate in another octagon showdown remains to be seen, but for now, it certainly offers an entertaining footnote in the careers of two of the UFC`s most compelling fighters.

Nathan Kirkwood
Nathan Kirkwood

Nathan Kirkwood, based in Leeds, has established himself as a respected voice in British sports media over the past decade. Initially covering amateur MMA events, he's evolved into a versatile analyst focusing on combat sports and NBA basketball.

Latest sports news